Participant Statistics
| No of Participants | 73 | Pairs /participant | 10 | No of Pairs | 730 | 
Analysis 1: contingency tables (descriptive statistics)
| Attraction Effect | Repulsion Effect | 
| A | B | D | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 
          TARGET 
        COMPETITOR  417  
         (57.123287671233 %)  
     | 
    
         COMPETITOR 
        COMPETITOR  53  
         (7.2602739726027 %)  
     | 
    
         COMPETITOR 
        DECOY  12  
         (1.6438356164384 %)  
     | 
  
| B | 
         TARGET 
        TARGET  165 
         (22.602739726027 %)  
     | 
      
         COMPETITOR 
        TARGET 71  
         (9.7260273972603 %)  
     | 
    
         TARGET 
        DECOY 5 
         (0.68493150684932 %)  
     | 
| D | 
         DECOY 
        TARGET  7  
         (0.95890410958904 %)  
     | 
    
         DECOY 
        COMPETITOR 0  
         (0 %)  
     | 
    
         DECOY 
        DECOY 0  
         (0 %)  
     | 
  
Analysis 2: inferential statistics (for R code)
ScoresA (10):| +1 | chose Target | +0 | chose Competitor | +0.5 | chose Decoy | 
| +1 | chose Competitor | +0 | chose Target | +0.5 | chose Decoy | 
| observation = 0 | no bias (no attraction or repulsion effect) | observation > 0 | attraction effect | observation < 0 | repulsion Effect | 
Analysis 3: analyze strategies (for R code)
StrategyScore (10):| +1 | AA and BB | +0 | AB and BA | +0.5 | D anywhere | 
| observation > 0.5 | the participant is "consistent" within pairs -> they most likely use the attributes in their choice | observation < 0.5 | the participant is inconsistent within pairs -> they most likely use a strategy that takes into account the position of the decoy. |